| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer |
|
|
| Author(s): Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Begovic M, DeCillis A, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, Cruz AB, Hoehn JL, Lees AW, Dimitrov NV, Bear HD |
| Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Volume: 16 Issue: 8 Pages: 2672-2685 Published: AUG 1998 |
| Times Cited: 714 References: 20 |
| Abstract: Purpose: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophasphamide (Cytoxan: AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. Patients and Methods: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response.
Results: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model.
Conclusion: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of, certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy. J Clin Oncol 16: 2672-2685. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
|
| Document Type: Article |
| Language: English |
| Reprint Address: Fisher, B (reprint author), Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Sci Directors Off, 4 Allegheny Ctr,Suite 602, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA |
Addresses:
1. Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Operat Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA 2. Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Ctr Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA |
| Publisher: W B SAUNDERS CO, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE WEST CURTIS CENTER, STE 300, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3399 USA |
| Subject Category: Oncology |
| IDS Number: 107NT |
| ISSN: 0732-183X |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |