| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: Rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals |
|
|
| Author(s): Marx WF, Cloft HJ, Do HM, Kallmes DF |
| Source: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY Volume: 20 Issue: 6 Pages: 1173-1177 Published: JUN-JUL 1999 |
| Times Cited: 49 References: 20 |
| Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abstract presentations are a valuable means of rapidly conveying new information; however, abstracts that fail to eventually become published are of little use to the general medical community, Our goals were to determine the publication rate of neuroradiologic papers originally presented at national meetings in 1993 and to assess publication rate as a function of neuroradiologic subspecialty and study design. METHODS: Proceedings from the 1993 ASNR and RSNA meetings were reviewed, A MEDLINE search encompassing 1993-1997 was performed cross-referencing lead author and at least one text word based on the abstract title, All ASNR and RSNA neuroradiologic abstracts were included. Study type, subspecialty classification, and sample size were tabulated. Publication rate, based on study design and neuroradiologic subspecialty, was compared with overall publication rate. Median duration from meeting presentation to publication was calculated, and the journals of publication were noted.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of ASNR abstracts and 33% of RSNA neuroradiologic abstracts were published as articles in indexed medical journals. Publication rates among neuroradiologic subspecialty types were not significantly different. Prospective studies presented at the ASNR were published at a higher rate than were retrospective studies. There was no difference between the publication rate of experimental versus clinical studies, Neuroradiologic abstracts were published less frequently than were abstracts within other medical specialties. Median time between abstract presentation and publication was 15 months.
CONCLUSION: Approximately one third of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993 were published in indexed journals. This rate is lower than that of abstracts from medical specialties other than radiology.
|
| Document Type: Article |
| Language: English |
| Reprint Address: Marx, WF (reprint author), Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Box 170, Charlottesville, VA 22901 USA |
Addresses:
1. Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Charlottesville, VA 22901 USA 2. Emory Univ, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA |
| Publisher: AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY, 2210 MIDWEST RD, OAK BROOK, IL 60521 USA |
| Subject Category: Clinical Neurology; Neuroimaging; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging |
| IDS Number: 224WC |
| ISSN: 0195-6108 |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |