ISI Web of Knowledge Take the next step  
Web of Science®
 
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods
Author(s): Thompson SG, Sharp SJ
Source: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE    Volume: 18    Issue: 20    Pages: 2693-2708    Published: OCT 30 1999  
Times Cited: 344     References: 45     
Abstract: Exploring the possible reasons for heterogeneity between studies is an important aspect of conducting a meta-analysis. This paper compares a number of methods which can be used to investigate whether a particular covariate, with a value defined for each study in the meta-analysis, explains any heterogeneity. The main example is from a meta-analysis of randomized trials of serum cholesterol reduction, in which the log-odds ratio for coronary events is related to the average extent of cholesterol reduction achieved in each trial. Different forms of weighted normal errors regression and random effects logistic regression are compared. These analyses quantify the extent to which heterogeneity is explained, as well as the effect of cholesterol reduction on the risk of coronary events. In a second example, the relationship between treatment effect estimates and their precision is examined, in order to assess the evidence for publication bias. We conclude that methods which allow for an additive component of residual heterogeneity should be used. Ln weighted regression, a restricted maximum likelihood estimator is appropriate, although a number of other estimators are also available. Methods which use the original form of the data explicitly, for example the binomial model for observed proportions rather than assuming normality of the log-odds ratios, are now computationally feasible. Although such methods are preferable in principle, they often give similar results in practice. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Reprint Address: Thompson, SG (reprint author), Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll, Sch Med, Dept Med Stat & Evaluat, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, England
Addresses:
1. Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll, Sch Med, Dept Med Stat & Evaluat, London W12 0NN, England
2. Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England
Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, BAFFINS LANE CHICHESTER, W SUSSEX PO19 1UD, ENGLAND
Subject Category: Mathematical & Computational Biology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Medical Informatics; Medicine, Research & Experimental; Statistics & Probability
IDS Number: 246WH
ISSN: 0277-6715
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
  
Thomson Reuters Logo