| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| Prevention of variceal rebleeding |
|
|
| Author(s): Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC |
| Source: LANCET Volume: 361 Issue: 9361 Pages: 952-954 Published: MAR 15 2003 |
| Times Cited: 70 References: 23 |
| Abstract: Context Variceal bleeding is the most frequent severe complication of portal hypertension and a leading cause of death and liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis. Patients surviving a variceal bleed are at high risk of rebleeding (over 60% at 1 year). Portacaval shunts and transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunts (TIPS) are effective for prevention of rebleeding but carry a high risk of hepatic encephalopathy. Endoscopic techniques include band ligation (EBL) and injection. sclerotherapy (EIS). Drug approaches are based on non-selective beta blocker with or without isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN). Starting point David Patch and colleagues (Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 1013-19) randomised 102 patients surviving a variceal bleeding to EBL or drug therapy with propranolol with the addition of ISMN if target reductions in portal pressure (evaluated by the hepatic venous pressure-gradient [HVPG]) were not achieved at 3 months. Overall, results of drug therapy were similar to those of EBL (44% vs 54% rebleeding at 1 year). There were no differences in survival or nonbleeding complications. Christophe Bureau and colleagues (Hepatoloy 2002; 36: 1361-66) treated 34 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension with propranolol and measured HVPG after a median of 4 days. Target HVPG reductions were achieved in 13 "responders". ISMN was added in the 21 "non-responders" and HVPG, measured again: seven more patients achieved target HPVG reduction. Re-bleeding rates were lower in responders than in nonresponders (10% vs 64%). Both studies suggest that drug therapy-can be improved by adding ISMN to b blockers in those patients with an insufficient decrease in HVPG.
Where next? Long-term drug therapy is emerging as effective treatment for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. The role of HVPG monitoring as a guide to identifying patients requiring further treatment needs to be further evaluated. Trials to determine the best treatment for, patients who do not respond to drug therapies are also required.
|
| Document Type: Review |
| Language: English |
| Reprint Address: Bosch, J (reprint author), Univ Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Hosp Clin,Inst Malalties Digest, Liver Unit,Hepat Haemodynam Lab, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain |
Addresses:
1. Univ Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Hosp Clin,Inst Malalties Digest, Liver Unit,Hepat Haemodynam Lab, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain |
| Publisher: LANCET LTD, 84 THEOBALDS RD, LONDON WC1X 8RR, ENGLAND |
| Subject Category: Medicine, General & Internal |
| IDS Number: 658VP |
| ISSN: 0140-6736 |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |