ISI Web of Knowledge Take the next step  
Web of Science®
 
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
Meta-analysis: Surgical treatment of obesity
Author(s): Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, Maglione M, Sugarman HJ, Livingston EH, Nguyen NT, Li ZP, Mojica WA, Hilton L, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Shekelle PG
Source: ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE    Volume: 142    Issue: 7    Pages: 547-559    Published: APR 5 2005  
Times Cited: 294     References: 94     
Abstract: Background: controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for weight loss and the resulting improvement in healthrelated outcomes.

Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis of effectiveness and adverse events associated with surgical treatment of obesity.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and systematic reviews. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials; observational studies; and case series reporting on surgical treatment of obesity.

Data Extraction: Information about study design, procedure, population, comorbid conditions, and adverse events.

Data Synthesis: The authors assessed 147 studies. Of these, 89 contributed to the weight loss analysis, 134 contributed to the mortality analysis, and 128 contributed to the complications analysis. The authors identified 1 large, matched cohort analysis that reported greater weight loss with surgery than with medical treatment in individuals with an average body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m(2) or greater. Surgery resulted in a weight loss of 20 to 30 kg, which was maintained for up to 10 years and was accompanied by improvements in some comorbid conditions. For BMIs of 35 to 39 kg/m(2), data from case series strongly support superiority of surgery but cannot be considered conclusive. Gastric bypass procedures result in more weight loss than gastroplasty. Bariatric procedures in current use (gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and biliopancreatic diversion and switch) have been performed with an overall mortality rate of less than 1%. Adverse events occur in about 20% of cases. A laparoscopic approach results in fewer wound complications than an open approach.

Limitations: only a few controlled trials were available for analysis. Heterogeneity was seen among studies, and publication bias is possible.

Conclusions: Surgery is more effective than nonsurgical treatment for weight loss and control of some comorbid conditions in patients with a BMI of 40 kg/m(2) or greater. More data are needed to determine the efficacy of surgery relative to nonsurgical therapy for less severely obese people. Procedures differ in efficacy and incidence of complications.

Document Type: Article
Language: English
Reprint Address: Maggard, MA (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, CHS Room 72-215,10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Addresses:
1. Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
2. So Calif Evidence Based Practice Ctr, RAND Hlth Div, Santa Monica, CA USA
3. Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
Publisher: AMER COLL PHYSICIANS, INDEPENDENCE MALL WEST 6TH AND RACE ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1572 USA
Subject Category: Medicine, General & Internal
IDS Number: 913QL
ISSN: 0003-4819
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
  
Thomson Reuters Logo