ISI Web of Knowledge Take the next step  
Web of Science®
 
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
ALLOGENEIC VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS PURGED BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR NEUROBLASTOMA - A REPORT FROM THE CHILDRENS-CANCER-GROUP
Author(s): MATTHAY KK, SEEGER RC, REYNOLDS CP, STRAM DO, OLEARY MC, HARRIS RE, SELCH M, ATKINSON JB, HAASE GM, RAMSAY NK
Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY    Volume: 12    Issue: 11    Pages: 2382-2389    Published: NOV 1994  
Times Cited: 66     References: 29     
Abstract: Purpose: We have compared the toxicity, relapse rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) of high-risk neuroblastoma patients receiving identical induction therapy and myeloablative chemotherapy plus total body irradiation (TBI) followed by allogeneic or autologous purged bone marrow transplantation (BMT).

Patients and Methods: Fifty-six patients with high-risk neuroblastoma underwent BMT at investigator and parent option if they did not have progressive disease after induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and eloposide. After surgery and local radiation to residual tumor, myeloablative therapy consisting of etoposide, melphalan, cisplatin, and TBI was given followed by BMT. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible siblings received allogeneic bone marrow (n = 20), The remaining patients (n = 36) received autologous bone marrow that had undergone multimodality purging and had no remaining detectable rumor cells by immunocytology.

Results: Four of 20 allogeneic patients had a treatment-related death, compared with three of 36 autologous patients (P = .21). The relapse rate among allogeneic BMT patients was 69%, compared with 46% for autologous BMT patients (P = .14). The estimated PFS rates 4 years after BMT were 25% for allogeneic BMT patients and 49% for autologous BMT patients (P = .051).

Conclusion: Overall outcome for patients with neuroblastoma given this same induction therapy followed by autologous purged marrow was similar to that with allogeneic marrow, although bias in patient selection cannot be excluded in a nonrandomized comparison.

Document Type: Article
Language: English
Reprint Address: MATTHAY, KK (reprint author), CHILDRENS CANC GRP, POB 60012, ARCADIA, CA 91066 USA
Addresses:
1. UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, SCH MED, DEPT PEDIAT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143 USA
2. UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, DEPT PEDIAT, LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 USA
3. UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, DEPT PATHOL, LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 USA
4. UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, DEPT SURG, LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 USA
5. CHILDRENS HOSP, LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 USA
6. UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, DEPT PREVENT MED, LOS ANGELES, CA 90033 USA
7. UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH MED, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
8. UNIV MINNESOTA, SCH MED, DEPT PEDIAT, MINNEAPOLIS, MN USA
9. MINNEAPOLIS CHILDRENS HLTH CTR, DEPT PEDIAT HEMATOL ONCOL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN USA
10. CHILDRENS HOSP, MED CTR, DEPT HEMATOL ONCOL, CINCINNATI, OH USA
11. CHILDRENS HOSP, DEPT SURG, DENVER, CO USA
Publisher: W B SAUNDERS CO, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE WEST CURTIS CENTER, STE 300, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3399
Subject Category: Oncology
IDS Number: PP880
ISSN: 0732-183X
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
  
Thomson Reuters Logo