ISI Web of Knowledge Take the next step  
Web of Science®
 
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES INCLUDING RECURSIVE PARTITIONING AND AMALGAMATION ALGORITHMS IN 1,052 PATIENTS
Author(s): PAESMANS M, SCULIER JP, LIBERT P, BUREAU G, DABOUIS G, THIRIAUX J, MICHEL J, VANCUTSEM O, SERGYSELS R, MOMMEN P, KLASTERSKY J
Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY    Volume: 13    Issue: 5    Pages: 1221-1230    Published: MAY 1995  
Times Cited: 174     References: 41     
Abstract: Purpose: This study attempted to determine the prognostic value for survival of various pretreatment characteristics in patients with nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer in the context of more than 10 years of experience of a European Cooperative Group,

Patients and Methods: We included in the analysis all eligible patients (N = 1,052) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer registered onto one of seven trials conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working party (ELCWP) during one decode, The patients were treated by chemotherapy regimens based on platinum derivatives. We prospectively collected 23 variables and analyzed them by univariate and multivariate methods.

Results: The global estimated median survival time was 29 weeks, with a 95% confidence interval of 27 to 30 weeks. After univariate analysis, we applied two multivariate statistical techniques. In a Cox regression model, the selected explanatory variables were disease extent, Karnofsky performance status, WBC and neutrophil counts, metastatic involvement of skin, serum calcium level, age, and sex. These results were confirmed by application of recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms (RECPAM), which led to classification of the patients into four homogeneous subgroups.

Conclusion: We confirmed by our analysis the role of well-known independent prognostic factors for survival, but also identified the effect of the neutrophil count, rarely studied, with the use of two methods: a classical Cox regression model and a RECPAM analysis. The classification of patients into the four subgroups we obtained needs to be validated in other series. (C) 1995 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Document Type: Article
Language: English
Reprint Address: PAESMANS, M (reprint author), INST JULES BORDET, MED SERV, UNITE BIOSTAT, 1 RUE HEGER BORDET, B-1000 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
Addresses:
1. HOP WARQUIGNIES, BOUSSU, BELGIUM
2. HOP CIVIL CHARLEROI, CHARLEROI, BELGIUM
3. CTR HOSP TIVOLI, LA LOUVIERE, BELGIUM
4. CLIN UNIV ST LUC, NAMUR, BELGIUM
5. HOP ST PIERRE & ERASME, BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
6. GRP MED ST REMI, REIMS, FRANCE
7. UNIV NANTES, CTR HOSP, NANTES, FRANCE
Publisher: W B SAUNDERS CO, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE WEST CURTIS CENTER, STE 300, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3399
Subject Category: Oncology
IDS Number: QV951
ISSN: 0732-183X
Previous Record (inactive) Record 1  of  1 Next Record (inactive)
Record from Web of Science®
  
Thomson Reuters Logo