| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| Radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma - A randomized multicenter study of sequential cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma stage 3B and 4A |
|
|
| Author(s): Sundfor K, Trope CG, Hogberg T, Onsrud M, Koern J, Simonsen E, Bertelsen K, Westberg R |
| Source: CANCER Volume: 77 Issue: 11 Pages: 2371-2378 Published: JUN 1 1996 |
| Times Cited: 61 References: 24 |
| Abstract: BACKGROUND. The locoregional failure rate remains high in advanced cervical carcinoma. Chemotherapy (CT) was added to radiotherapy (RT) in order to increase disease control and to improve 5-year survival. METHODS. CT+RT included cisplatin administered 100 mg/m(2), d.l plus 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2) D.1 to 5, ci (120 hrs), q every 3rd week for 3 cycles, followed by RT. RT included external beam irradiation 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, five days a week, by 4-field box technique. The median follow-up was 46 months. Ninety-four patients were evaluable for survival, 47 in the CT+RT group and 47 in the RT group. Ninety-two patients were evaluable for response. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed between the two groups.
RESULTS. Of the 43 patients evaluable before RT, 31 (72%) achieved a partial or complete response after CT alone. After RT, 52 patients attained a complete response, 25 in the CT+RT group and 27 in the RT-group. Sixty-three patients developed distant metastases or local relapse, 30 in the CT+RT group and 33 in the RT group. In the CT+RT group 6 of the 9 patients with metastases also had local progression at relapse, in the RT group, 7 of 17 patients. The survival rates for the two groups are not statistically different. Thirty-seven patients are alive, 29 have no evidence of disease. Fifty-seven have died, 29 in the CT+RT group and 28 in the RT group. Fifty-four deaths were related to cancer, and 3 to therapy.
CONCLUSIONS. Sequential CT and RT did not improve the survival, local control, or metastasis rate compared with RT alone. (C) 1996 American Cancer Society.
|
| Document Type: Proceedings Paper |
| Language: English |
| Reprint Address: Sundfor, K (reprint author), NORWEGIAN RADIUM HOSP, DEPT GYNECOL ONCOL, N-0310 OSLO, NORWAY |
Addresses:
1. UNIV HOSP, DEPT GYNECOL ONCOL, LINKOPING, SWEDEN 2. UNIV HOSP, DEPT GYNECOL ONCOL, TROMSO, NORWAY 3. UNIV HOSP, DEPT GYNECOL ONCOL, TRONDHEIM, NORWAY 4. UNIV HOSP, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL, ODENSE, DENMARK 5. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, DEPT CANC CLIN RES, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN |
| Publisher: WILEY-LISS, DIV JOHN WILEY & SONS INC 605 THIRD AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10158-0012 |
| Subject Category: Oncology |
| IDS Number: UM089 |
| ISSN: 0008-543X |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |