| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| Clinical toxicity and laboratory effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) mobilization and blood stem cell apheresis from normal donors, and analysis of charges for the procedures |
|
|
| Author(s): Anderlini P, Przepiorka D, Seong D, Miller P, Sundberg J, Lichtiger B, Norfleet F, Chan KW, Champlin R, Korbling M |
| Source: TRANSFUSION Volume: 36 Issue: 7 Pages: 590-595 Published: JUL 1996 |
| Times Cited: 102 References: 22 |
| Abstract: Background: Apheresis of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim)-mobilized blood stem cells from normal donors is now being used in place of a marrow harvest in transplantation. How the adverse effects of and charges for this procedure compare with those of the standard marrow harvest is not known. Study Design and Methods: Forty consecutive normal subjects who received filgrastim (6 mu g/kg) subcutaneously twice daily for 4 to 6 days in preparation for apheresis were monitored prospectively by clinical and laboratory evaluation.
Results: Sixty-two percent of the subjects required oral analgesics. None discontinued filgrastim prematurely. Bone pain (82%), headache (70%), fatigue (20%), and nausea (10%) were reported. Filgrastim caused a mean eightfold increase in neutrophil counts, a mean twofold increase in lymphocyte counts, a mean twofold rise in alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, and minor changes in serum potassium, magnesium, and uric acid. Adverse events and laboratory effects resolved within 7 days after apheresis. No apheresis stem cell donor required transfusion or hospitalization, and only one required an additional clinic visit after completion of apheresis. By comparison, a retrospective analysis of 33 normal marrow donors demonstrated that all received transfusion(s), 3 were hospitalized, and 3 required additional clinic visits after the marrow harvest. The median total charges related to the two procedures were comparable (p = 0.43), although the charges were significantly lower for donors requiring only one apheresis procedure (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Filgrastim mobilization and apheresis of blood stem cells constitute a safe, well-tolerated, and comparable or less expensive alternative to the traditional marrow harvest.
|
| Document Type: Article |
| Language: English |
Addresses:
1. UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR, SECT TRANSFUS MED & PATIENT CARE BUSINESS AFFAIRS, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA 2. UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR, TRANSFUS MED SECT, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA 3. UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR, SECT BLOOD & MARROW TRANSPLANTAT, APHERESIS UNIT, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA 4. UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR, SECT PEDIAT BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTAT, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA |
| Publisher: AMER ASSOC BLOOD BANKS, 8101 GLENBROOK RD, BETHESDA, MD 20814-2749 |
| Subject Category: Hematology |
| IDS Number: VB367 |
| ISSN: 0041-1132 |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |