| | |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | |  |
| Economic analysis of adjuvant interferon alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma based on projections from eastern cooperative oncology group 1684 |
|
|
| Author(s): Hillner BE, Kirkwood JM, Atkins MB, Johnson ER, Smith TJ |
| Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Volume: 15 Issue: 6 Pages: 2351-2358 Published: JUN 1997 |
| Times Cited: 69 References: 25 |
| Abstract: Purpose: Interferon alfa-2b (IFN) in a randomized clinical (E1684) prolonged relapse-free and total survival in high-risk resected melanoma. However, the costs and toxicities of IFN are barriers to its widespread use. This study was undertaken to analyze the projected costs and long-term benefits of IFN by combining prospectively collected data on IFN actual dosage, time of recurrence, and survival with secondary data on longterm melanoma recurrence risks to project the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant IFN compared with observation. Patients and Methods: Two hypothetical cohorts of 50-year-old-melanoma patients whose mean IFN dosage and clinical results were directly taken from E1684 were included in the study. Melanoma recurrence risks beyond 5 years were derived from international databases. Melanoma recurrence care costs and quality-of-life adjustments, when considered, were based on expert consensus. End points were incremental costs, life-years gained, and cost per life-year gained with and without quality-of-life adjustments,
Results: The IFN cohort was projected to have an increased (undiscounted) survival of 0.52 years at 7 years and 1.90 years over a lifetime. The projected incremental cost (in 1996 United Stares dollars) per life-year gained in the IFN cohort ranged from $13,700 after 35 years to $32,600 at 7 years, the median follow-up of E1684. Using assigned quality-of-life values for IFN and recurrence, the lifetime cost per quality adjusted life-year increased to $15,200. Even if treatment costs for recurrence were excluded, the lifetime incremental cost per life-year gained was $21,600.
Conclusion: the cost and toxicity of IFN must be balanced against its projected benefits in high-risk melanoma. The derived cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios for IFN were comparable to other cancer interventions for which cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed. (C) 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
|
| Document Type: Article |
| Language: English |
| Reprint Address: Hillner, BE (reprint author), VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV, MED COLL VIRGINIA, DEPT INTERNAL MED, MASSEY CANC CTR, RICHMOND, VA 23298 USA |
Addresses:
1. UNIV PITTSBURGH, INST CANC, PITTSBURGH, PA USA 2. TUFTS UNIV, NEW ENGLAND MED CTR, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA 3. SCHERING PLOUGH INC, KENILWORTH, NJ USA |
| Publisher: W B SAUNDERS CO, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE WEST CURTIS CENTER, STE 300, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3399 |
| Subject Category: Oncology |
| IDS Number: XD977 |
| ISSN: 0732-183X |
|
| |  |  |  |  | | | | Record from Web of Science® | |  |  | | | | | | |